[Barisaheb] assured me that there was
warrant enough for Satyagraha in the Holy Koran. He agreed with the
interpretation of the Koran to the effect that, whilst violence under
certain well-defined circumstances is permissible, self-restraint is
dearer to God than violence, and that is the law of love. That is
Satyagraha. Violence is concession to human weakness, Satyagraha is an
obligation. Even from the practical standpoint it is easy enough to see
that violence can do no good and only do infinite harm.
Some Muslim friends tell me that Muslims
will never subscribe to unadulterated nonviolence. With them, they say,
violence is as lawful and necessary as nonviolence. The use of either
depends upon circumstances. It does not need Koranic authority to
justify the lawfulness of both. That is the well-known path the world
has traversed through the ages. There is no such thing as unadulterated
violence in the world. But I have heard it from many Muslim friends
that the Koran teaches the use of nonviolence. It regards forbearance
as superior to vengeance. The very word Islam means peace, which is
nonviolence. Badshahkhan, a staunch Muslim who never misses his namaz
and Ramzan, has accepted out and out nonviolence as his creed. It would
be no answer to say that he does not live up to his creed, even as I
know to my shame that I do not one of kind, it is of degree. But,
argument about nonviolence in the Holy Koran is an interpolation, not
necessary for my thesis.
No comments:
Post a Comment