My nonviolence does not admit of running
away from danger and leaving dear ones unprotected. Between violence
and cowardly flight, I can only prefer violence to cowardice. I can no
more preach nonviolence to a coward than I can tempt a blind man to
enjoy healthy scenes. Nonviolence is the summit of bravery. And in my
own experience, I have had no difficulty in demonstrating to men
trained in the school of violence the superiority of nonviolence. As a
coward, which I was for years, I harboured violence. I began to prize
nonviolence only when I began to shed cowardice. Those Hindus who ran
away from the post of duty when it was attended with danger did so not
because they were nonviolent, or because they were afraid to strike,
but because they were unwilling to die or even suffer an injury. A
rabbit that runs away from the bull terrier is not particularly
nonviolent. The poor thing trembles at the sight of the terrier and
runs for very life.
Nonviolence is not a cover for cowardice,
but it is the supreme virtue of the brave. Exercise of nonviolence
requires far greater bravery than that of swordsmanship. Cowardice is
wholly inconsistent with nonviolence. Translation from swordsmanship to
nonviolence is possible and, at times, even an easy stage. Nonviolence,
therefore, presupposes ability to strike. It is a conscious deliberate
restraint put upon one's desire for vengeance. But vengeance is any day
superior to passive, effeminate and helpless submission. Forgiveness is
higher still. Vengeance too is weakness. The desire for vengeance comes
out of fear of harm, imaginary or real. A dog barks and bites when he
fears. A man who fears no one on earth would consider it too
troublesome even to summon up anger against one who is vainly trying to
injure him. The sun does not wreak vengeance upon little children who
throw dust at him. They only harm themselves in the act.
The path of true nonviolence requires much more courage than violence.
The minimum that is required of a person
wishing to cultivate the ahimsa of the brave is first to clear one's
thought of cowardice and, in the light of the clearance, regulate his
conduct in every activity, great or small. Thus the votary must refuse
to be cowed down by his superior, without being angry. He must,
however, be ready to sacrifice his post, however remunerative it may
be. Whilst sacrificing his all, if the votary has no sense of
irritation against his employer, he has ahimsa of the brave in him.
Assume that a fellow-passenger threatens
my son with assault and I reason with the would-be-assailant who then
turns upon me. If then I take his blow with grace and dignity, without
harbouring any ill-will against him, I exhibit the ahimsa of the brave.
Such instances are of every day occurrence and can be easily
multiplied. If I succeed in curbing my temper every time and, though
able to give blow for blow, I refrain, I shall develop the ahimsa of
the brave which will never fail me and which will compel recognition
from the most confirmed adversaries.
Inculcation of cowardice is against my
nature. Ever since my return from South Africa, where a few thousand
had stood up not unsuccessfully against heavy odds, I have made it my
mission to preach true bravery which ahimsameans.
No comments:
Post a Comment