Just as one must learn the art of killing
in the training for violence, so one must learn the art of dying in the
training for nonviolence. Violence does not mean emancipation from
fear, but discovering the means of combating the cause of fear.
Nonviolence, on the other hand, has no cause for fear. The votary of
nonviolence has to cultivate the capacity for sacrifice of the highest
type in order to be free from fear. He recks not if he should lose his
land, his wealth, his life. He who has not overcome all fear cannot
practice ahimsa to perfection. The votary of ahimsa has only one fear,
that is of God. He who seeks refuge in God ought to have a glimpse of
the Atman that transcends the body; and the moment one has a glimpse of
the Imperishable Atman, one sheds the love of the perishable body.
Training in nonviolence is thus diametrically opposed to training in
violence. Violence is needed for the protection of things external,
nonviolence is needed for the protection of the Atman, for the
protection of one's honour.
This nonviolence cannot be learnt by
staying at home. It needs enterprise. In order to test ourselves we
should learn to dare danger and death, mortify the flesh, and acquire
the capacity to endure all manner of hardships. He who trembles or take
to his heels the moment he sees two people fighting is not nonviolent,
but a coward. A nonviolent person will lay down his life in preventing
such quarrels. The bravery of the nonviolent is vastly superior to that
of the violent. The badge of the violent is his weapon--spear, or
sword, or rifle. God is the shield of the nonviolent.
This is not course of training for one intending to learn nonviolence. But it is easy to evolve one from the principles I have laid down.
No comments:
Post a Comment